Over the past couple years, as I've had a steady writing job and ascended from "utter nobody" to "D-list pundit," I find it harder and harder to have discussions online. Twitter is the only social network I like and where I talk to people the most, but as your number of followers increases, the user experience becomes steadily more hostile to conversation. Here's my theory as to why this happens. First is Twitter's powerful tendency to create cliques and groupthink. Back in forum and blog comment section days, people would more often hang out in places where a certain interest or baseline understanding could be assumed. (Now, there were often epic fights, cliques, and gratuitous cruelty on forums too, particularly the joke or insult variety, but in my experience it was also much easier to just have a reasonable conversation.) On Twitter, people rather naturally form those same communities of like interest, but are trapped in the same space with differe
As someone with very similar tastes, Wondermark gets top marks.
ReplyDeleteThough since some of the more recent ones tend toward multi-strip arcs, hitting 'random' is probably a better method of trial evaluation than working back sequentially.
DeleteThanks!
ReplyDeleteDinosaur Comics
ReplyDeleteWhy is there no reference to www.pbfcomics.com
ReplyDeleteDr. McNinja, Get Fuzzy, Frank and Ernest
ReplyDeleteMarried To The Sea can either be awesome or completely nonsensical
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot, everyone! I'll check these out.
ReplyDeleteYou're missing a lot of awesome webcomics: there are almost too many to keep track of. In particular, I like "Whomp!" which hits way too close to home. "Faraday the Blob" is zany and off-the-wall. "Dustpiggies" is rather aggressively weird, but reliably good for a chuckle. "Tom the Dancing Bug" nails politics with a high-powered nail gun. "Doctor Emery's Nightmares" is just getting started (she's my daughter-out-law). There are a bunch more. It really is a golden age of webcomics.
ReplyDelete