Skip to main content

Misallocated capital

Everyone knows that the Aughts had some of the weakest growth in postwar American history.




But one under-discussed part of this is just why this was. After all, Greenspan kept interest rates super-low for most of the Aughts.  According to standard monetary economics, that's supposed to be powerfully stimulative—so much so that we should have had a roaring, overheated economy with real danger of inflation.  So what happened?  According to Johnson & Kwak in 13 Bankers:


(Yves Smith, by the way, makes a similar argument in ECONned.) I had a back-and-forth with Kevin Drum over email the other day discussing why the all that money flowed into the housing sector rather than somewhere else.  The picture I'm beginning to put together here is basically threefold.  First, the pile of money involved in housing is, like, real big:

(Image from Karl Smith.) Obviously that's not precisely the amount of money available to banks, but it gives you a sense of the size of it.  Prior to all that "innovation" from investment banks, this pile was basically a sleepy backwater.  So here comes the second factor; the part of the crisis that has been done to death.  Banks used to give out mortgages and hang on to them for the duration of the loan, so they were understandably cautious about what kind of person was taking the money.  Fast forward through the "originate and distribute" model, tranched securities, CDOs and CDSs, blah blah blah, and banks were basically pouring money into the housing market, money that was in the end sent down the garbage disposal.

The third factor is general US policy to support homeownership; a bunch of tax credits and so forth.  (Conservatives' explanation of the crisis, by the way, rests entirely on the part of this factor that was going to minorities and the poor.)  This stimulated demand for housing and thus added a few RPMs to the mortgage doomsday machine.  Obviously this is quite loose and non-quantitative, but this combination of foolish policy and a careening, insane financial sector seems to have starved legitimate enterprises of the loans they would normally get during a period of loose money, loans that should have sparked a fierce economic boom.

Wall Street's only legitimate function is to allocate capital.  They can't even do that, it seems.

Comments

  1. Hi Ryan, according to Kwak? Serious? :-D B

    ReplyDelete
  2. Johnson and Kwak, mind you. Sounds like a law firm. Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe-style.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Refusing to Vote for Bloomberg

Billionaire Mike Bloomberg is attempting to buy the Democratic nomination. With something like $400 million in personal spending so far, that much is clear — and it appears to be working at least somewhat well, as he is nearing second place in national polls. I would guess that he will quickly into diminishing returns, but on the other hand spending on this level is totally unprecedented. At this burn rate he could easily spend more than the entire 2016 presidential election cost both parties before the primary is over.

I published a piece today outlining why I would not vote for Bloomberg against Trump (I would vote for Sanders, Warren, Buttigieg, Klobuchar, or Biden), even though I live in a swing state. This got a lot of "vote blue no matter who" people riled up. They scolded me and demanded that I pre-commit to voting for Bloomberg should he win the nomination. The argument as I understand it is to try to make it as likely as possible that whatever Democrat wins the nomi…

Varanus albigularis albigularis

That is the Latin name for the white-throated monitor lizard, a large reptile native to southern Africa that can grow up to two meters long (see pictures of one at the Oakland Zoo here). In Setswana, it's called a "gopane." I saw one of these in my village yesterday on the way back from my run. Some kids from school found it in the riverbed and tortured it to death, stabbing out its eyes, cutting off its tail, and gutting it which finally killed it. It seemed to be a female as there were a bunch of round white things I can only imagine were eggs amongst the guts. I only arrived after it was already dead, but they described what had happened with much hilarity and re-enactment.

When I asked why they killed it, they said it was because it would eat their chickens and eggs, which is probably true, and because it sucks blood from people, which is completely ridiculous. It might bite a person, but not unless threatened. It seems roughly the same as killing wolves that e…

The Basic Instinct of Socialism

This year I finally decided to stop beating around the bush and start calling myself a democratic socialist. I think the reason for the long hesitation is the very long record of horrifying atrocities carried out by self-described socialist countries. Of course, there is no social system that doesn't have a long, bloody rap sheet, capitalism very much included. But I've never described myself as a capitalist either, and the whole point of socialism is that it's supposed to be better than that.

So of course I cannot be a tankie — Stalin and Mao were evil, terrible butchers, some of the worst people who ever lived. There are two basic lessons to be learned from the failures of Soviet and Chinese Communism, I think. One is that Marxism-Leninism is not a just or workable system. One cannot simply skip over capitalist development, and any socialist project must be democratic and preserve basic liberal freedoms.

The second, perhaps more profound lesson, is that there is no socia…