Skip to main content

Misallocated capital

Everyone knows that the Aughts had some of the weakest growth in postwar American history.




But one under-discussed part of this is just why this was. After all, Greenspan kept interest rates super-low for most of the Aughts.  According to standard monetary economics, that's supposed to be powerfully stimulative—so much so that we should have had a roaring, overheated economy with real danger of inflation.  So what happened?  According to Johnson & Kwak in 13 Bankers:


(Yves Smith, by the way, makes a similar argument in ECONned.) I had a back-and-forth with Kevin Drum over email the other day discussing why the all that money flowed into the housing sector rather than somewhere else.  The picture I'm beginning to put together here is basically threefold.  First, the pile of money involved in housing is, like, real big:

(Image from Karl Smith.) Obviously that's not precisely the amount of money available to banks, but it gives you a sense of the size of it.  Prior to all that "innovation" from investment banks, this pile was basically a sleepy backwater.  So here comes the second factor; the part of the crisis that has been done to death.  Banks used to give out mortgages and hang on to them for the duration of the loan, so they were understandably cautious about what kind of person was taking the money.  Fast forward through the "originate and distribute" model, tranched securities, CDOs and CDSs, blah blah blah, and banks were basically pouring money into the housing market, money that was in the end sent down the garbage disposal.

The third factor is general US policy to support homeownership; a bunch of tax credits and so forth.  (Conservatives' explanation of the crisis, by the way, rests entirely on the part of this factor that was going to minorities and the poor.)  This stimulated demand for housing and thus added a few RPMs to the mortgage doomsday machine.  Obviously this is quite loose and non-quantitative, but this combination of foolish policy and a careening, insane financial sector seems to have starved legitimate enterprises of the loans they would normally get during a period of loose money, loans that should have sparked a fierce economic boom.

Wall Street's only legitimate function is to allocate capital.  They can't even do that, it seems.

Comments

  1. Hi Ryan, according to Kwak? Serious? :-D B

    ReplyDelete
  2. Johnson and Kwak, mind you. Sounds like a law firm. Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe-style.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Did Reality Winner Leak to the Intercept?

So Reality Winner, former NSA contractor, is in federal prison for leaking classified information — for five years and three months, the longest sentence of any whistleblower in history. She gave documents on how Russia had attempted to hack vendors of election machinery and software to The Intercept , which completely bungled basic security procedures (according to a recent New York Times piece from Ben Smith, the main fault lay with Matthew Cole and Richard Esposito ), leading to her capture within hours. Winner recently contracted COVID-19 in prison, and is reportedly suffering some lingering aftereffects. Glenn Greenwald has been furiously denying that he had anything at all to do with the Winner clusterfuck, and I recently got in an argument with him about it on Twitter. I read a New York story about Winner, which clearly implies that she was listening to the Intercepted podcast of March 22, 2017 , where Greenwald and Jeremy Scahill expressed skepticism about Russia actually b

Varanus albigularis albigularis

That is the Latin name for the white-throated monitor lizard , a large reptile native to southern Africa that can grow up to two meters long (see pictures of one at the Oakland Zoo here ). In Setswana, it's called a "gopane." I saw one of these in my village yesterday on the way back from my run. Some kids from school found it in the riverbed and tortured it to death, stabbing out its eyes, cutting off its tail, and gutting it which finally killed it. It seemed to be a female as there were a bunch of round white things I can only imagine were eggs amongst the guts. I only arrived after it was already dead, but they described what had happened with much hilarity and re-enactment. When I asked why they killed it, they said it was because it would eat their chickens and eggs, which is probably true, and because it sucks blood from people, which is completely ridiculous. It might bite a person, but not unless threatened. It seems roughly the same as killing wolves that

Internet Writing and the Content Vacuum

It's been a few times now I've had full weekday control of the Monthly 's headline blog, Political Animal, and I feel like I have a decent idea now what it's like being at the top level of blogging. (Not to say that I am  at the top level, of course, just that I've walked in those shoes for a few days and gotten some blisters.) Anyway, the first thing I've noticed is that it is really, really hard to do well. I've had days before when I just didn't have anything to do and ended up at home writing 4-5 posts in one day on this site, but pro blogging is an entirely different beast. The expectation is that during the day you will write 10-12 posts. This includes an intro music video, a lunch links post, and evening links and/or video. So that means 7-9 short, punchy essays on something , with maybe 1-2 of those being longer and more worked out thoughts. This ferocious demand for content is both good and bad. The iron weight of responsibiliy—the knowledge