Skip to main content

*Margin Call*

WARNING: A few spoilers ahead. So far, this is the best movie qua movie on the financial crisis. It's a tense little drama, only encompassing about 24 hours, with mostly excellent characters, writing, pacing, acting, and directing. I won't go into too much detail; others have already done that better than I could.

I will say a few words on the actual nature of the crisis, which is revealed in some very subtle and pleasing ways. First is how the further up the food chain you go, the less people in the firm understand how their business actually works, and as a consequence don't really have a good grip on what kinds of risk the firm is taking. The CEO tells the financial wizard who figures out what is going to happen to speak to him like a "small child." On a related point, when one of the few characters with a flickering of a conscience (the same wizard) lays out his impressive background in physics, we get a glimpse of how Wall Street has, through preposterously high salaries, strip-mined America for her best minds. And these geniuses, in the end, end up engineering financial Armageddon. The CEO makes a great speech trying to justify his huge sell, laying out 400 years of repeated financial crises and saying "We can't help ourselves."

However, there were a few details one might include as a footnote, to make sure people don't take away the wrong impression. The first, and maybe most important, is that no large bank in America would have survived the crisis alone. Margin Call sort of implies that the (fictional) firm has saved itself by starting a financial panic, but in reality all the big banks had to be rescued by the government. The one that didn't, Lehman Brothers, went bankrupt—actually, that is what touched the whole thing off. Second is that the collapse of the subprime mortgage bond market is portrayed as a complete surprise. That may have been the case in some firms, but a lot of them saw it coming, at least a bit in advance, and tried to profit from it. Finally, I don't think it would have been possible to make the big sell shown near the end. Like when Long-Term Capital Management went down in the 90s, these guys were such a large part of the market that if they had tried to unwind in a single day it would have been flatly impossible.

Really niggling details though, especially for a Hollywood drama. Overall, highly recommended.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Did Reality Winner Leak to the Intercept?

So Reality Winner, former NSA contractor, is in federal prison for leaking classified information — for five years and three months, the longest sentence of any whistleblower in history. She gave documents on how Russia had attempted to hack vendors of election machinery and software to The Intercept , which completely bungled basic security procedures (according to a recent New York Times piece from Ben Smith, the main fault lay with Matthew Cole and Richard Esposito ), leading to her capture within hours. Winner recently contracted COVID-19 in prison, and is reportedly suffering some lingering aftereffects. Glenn Greenwald has been furiously denying that he had anything at all to do with the Winner clusterfuck, and I recently got in an argument with him about it on Twitter. I read a New York story about Winner, which clearly implies that she was listening to the Intercepted podcast of March 22, 2017 , where Greenwald and Jeremy Scahill expressed skepticism about Russia actual...

The Setswana Grammar Manual

One of my few successes during my service here was formatting the Peace Corps South Africa grammar manual for Setswana, written mostly by Art Chambers, an SA16 volunteer.  For anyone wanting to learn Setswana, I reckon it's a pretty good primer, so I present it for free here .  If you think it sucks and you want to make changes, or you'd like to take a look at the raw TeX file, you can find it here .

On Refusing to Vote for Bloomberg

Billionaire Mike Bloomberg is attempting to buy the Democratic nomination. With something like $400 million in personal spending so far, that much is clear — and it appears to be working at least somewhat well, as he is nearing second place in national polls. I would guess that he will quickly into diminishing returns, but on the other hand spending on this level is totally unprecedented. At this burn rate he could easily spend more than the entire 2016 presidential election cost both parties before the primary is over. I published a piece today outlining why I would not vote for Bloomberg against Trump (I would vote for Sanders, Warren, Buttigieg, Klobuchar, or Biden), even though I live in a swing state. This got a lot of "vote blue no matter who" people riled up . They scolded me and demanded that I pre-commit to voting for Bloomberg should he win the nomination. The argument as I understand it is to try to make it as likely as possible that whatever Democrat wins t...