Skip to main content

I didn't know Glenn Beck had compared Peace Corps to the Nazis

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Back in Black - Glenn Beck's Nazi Tourette's
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical HumorTea Party
You can't help but laugh at such mind-warping levels of chumpitude. It's like all previous iterations of the chump personality boiled down to its very essence, then left on the stove to smoulder for a week and chipped out of the bottom of the pot with a greasy screwdriver. But seriously: Glenn Beck? Eat my shorts.

UPDATE: Whoa. I'm getting some serious (for me, anyway) traffic on this post. Feel free to leave any questions in comments. I will usually respond, so long as you're reasonably polite.

Comments

  1. Another idealistic, head in the sand liberal. Someday you will learn that the Peace Corps just exists so that the US can pretend it cares about third world countries while actually exploiting all of their resources to continue its quality of life. You allow the US to continue its Nazi-like oppression of the rest of the world without a qualm. Glenn Beck may not always make sense, but at least he doesn't accept the duplicitous actions of the government at face value. You are actually causing the continued poverty of the people you claim to be helping.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like that you admit off the top that Glenn Beck doesn't make sense.

    The ideological head space of your comment is vaguely troubling--since when have Glenn Beck fans given a shit about third-world countries? Or known that they exist? I would think that if Peace Corps were really bleeding tiny, defenseless countries of all their natural resources, Beck would be all for it. (America FIRST!)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Setswana Grammar Manual

One of my few successes during my service here was formatting the Peace Corps South Africa grammar manual for Setswana, written mostly by Art Chambers, an SA16 volunteer.  For anyone wanting to learn Setswana, I reckon it's a pretty good primer, so I present it for free here .  If you think it sucks and you want to make changes, or you'd like to take a look at the raw TeX file, you can find it here .

On Refusing to Vote for Bloomberg

Billionaire Mike Bloomberg is attempting to buy the Democratic nomination. With something like $400 million in personal spending so far, that much is clear — and it appears to be working at least somewhat well, as he is nearing second place in national polls. I would guess that he will quickly into diminishing returns, but on the other hand spending on this level is totally unprecedented. At this burn rate he could easily spend more than the entire 2016 presidential election cost both parties before the primary is over. I published a piece today outlining why I would not vote for Bloomberg against Trump (I would vote for Sanders, Warren, Buttigieg, Klobuchar, or Biden), even though I live in a swing state. This got a lot of "vote blue no matter who" people riled up . They scolded me and demanded that I pre-commit to voting for Bloomberg should he win the nomination. The argument as I understand it is to try to make it as likely as possible that whatever Democrat wins t...

Russiagate and the Left, Round II

Corey Robin has responded to my article arguing that the left should take the Trump-Russia story more seriously . I do appreciate that he considers me an ally, and I feel the same towards him. However I am not convinced. The points I want to make are somewhat disconnected, so I will just take them one at a time. What should be done? Robin complains that I don't give much attention to the question of how we should respond to Russian electoral espionage. As an initial matter, the question of whether a problem is an important one is logically distinct from what the response should be. There is a sizable vein of skepticism about Russiagate on the left, and the argument of the post was that skepticism was misplaced. Solutions can be worked out later. This point is rather similar to the centrist argument that you can't talk about Medicare for All unless you've got a fully costed-out bill detailing all the necessary taxes and regulation. However, I have advanced some pol...